contentSutra.com - India\'s Digital News Monitor

Current Story

Ajit Balakrishnan: Most VC Funding US Skewed; Expect Slowdown In 18 Months

By Rafat Ali - Sun 10 Feb 2008 04:51 PM PST

[by Cerius Shah] While the consecutive sessions at Esummit 08 at IIT Powai were insightful, few, as expected, had a media focus.

The emerging entrepreneurial eco-system in India was moderated by Vinnie Vyas of Crossover.  Ajit Balakrishnan made comments on the absence of VC’s in early stage funding. Pointing to the fact that VC’s currently like to cluster their investments within a sector, like travel (co-incidentally Sandeep Murthy, Sherpalo Ventures, Cleartrip, was also on the same panel).

According to Balakrishanan, the capital markets in the US are set for a reversal and due to the fact that a vast majority of Indian VC funding is US based, many VC’s will likely exit the scene in 18 months. His solution? Let the vast repositories of funds in LIC and UTI be used as indigenous venture capital firms that can fuel innovation rather than rely heavily on foreign funding. Should we start opening up our indigenous coffers or let the markets decide what money was dumb or smart should Apocalypse ‘99 Redux arrive?

Posted in: Companies, Rediff, Venture Capital



Related Research from Alacrastore.com
5 Responses:
  • From Jassim Ali Sun 10 Feb 2008 11:54 PM

    What happend to the VC fund that BSNL was setting up ?

  • From Santosh Mon 11 Feb 2008 12:28 AM

    Ajit is spot on… In fact, it is seen that most of the VC fundings happens in packs… First there was a host of VC funding in Travel portals, then it was Social Networks,...now it seems that mobile marketing is in spotlight…

    I guess it is time that indeginous VCs play an important role in funding innovations…

  • From Morpheus Mon 11 Feb 2008 01:50 AM

    I don’t agree so much with Ajit. Well, it is not just about *dumb* money. Yes, LIC and UTI have a lot of money and so do SBI or PNB or IOB etc. But, that is different from *high quality* VC money. Many of these guys had started and some of them continue to operate VC funds. Howcome, none of them made any real impact? When experienced entrepreneurs and VCs from developed markets such as Silicon Valley invest in a company, it is not only the money they bring in, but also management expertise, connections, brand value etc - all of which are absolutely vital for a young startup to get going. I am surprised that someone of Ajit’s stature has made such a *hollow* statement.

  • From Nikhil Pahwa Mon 11 Feb 2008 03:18 AM

    Morpheus: you can’t deny the herd mentality...some Indian VCs have been heard to complain that there’s pressure from their US associates to invest in the sectors that have worked abroad. Secondly, Ajit isn’t saying that VCs don’t bring anything to the table. Interestingly, Ajit’s view of VCs exiting ventures in around 18 months, mirrors something that Sanjeev Bikhchandani had said in an earnings conference call.

  • From Old Hand Tue 12 Feb 2008 12:20 AM

    What had Sanjiv said in an earnings conf call.
    Please enlighten us—really appreciate the pointer.

    On one hand VCs are raising big funds and saying they will go to India - recently Canaan $650M, ICICI $3B, etc.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

contentSutra.com is a news site covering India's digital content market.

Rafat Ali
Publisher

Cerius Shah
Contributing Writer

Online Ad Deals Report

Social Media Report

Recently on paidContent.org

Jobs

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters